Packers & Movers Website Development
Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.
See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ
1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there’s no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn’t seem to be within the project’s scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn’t have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article’s talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn’t the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don’t agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren’t the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it’s the best system we’ve been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don’t hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.
Add WikiProject Green Bay Packers to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.
An article’s quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):
For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).
Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. –>
WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.
- Add new requests above
The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.
(Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007
A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade. Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.
See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom
In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.
The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who’re moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.
The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.
Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.
Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It’s often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.
Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship.
Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series’ first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria’s character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.
The show’s writers responded by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season’s finale, “Jane’s Addition”, when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.
That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane’s boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane’s friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, “Dye! Dye! My Darling,” broadcast August 2, 2000. With Jane and Tom’s relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom’s car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.
This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show’s writers in a piece on MTV’s website.
In interviews done after the series’ run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that “any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,” Tom came about because “going into our fourth year… I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career,” and “teaser” episodes like “Pierce Me” were “intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria’s love life.”
The Harry Potter series’ most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione “are very platonic friends”.
Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron’s younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has “given up” on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione’s advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry’s difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry’s “ideal girl” from the very beginning.
An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were “still valued members of her readership”, but that there had been “anvil-sized hints” for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.
Rowling’s attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:
The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the “EWE” tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning “Epilogue, What Epilogue?”
Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically “in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]” and that Hermione and Ron had “too much fundamental incompatibility.” She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together “as a form of wish fulfillment” as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right. She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry’s love for Ginny is true, thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.
The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw “shipping wars” that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.
Shortly after the series’ debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show’s producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his “Warrior Queen.” Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.
According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were “undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry”, while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who “approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle” in which “denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives”. She added:
In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the “shipping wars” in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter’s point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled “The Discrimination in the Xenaverse” in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!, and also in numerous letters in response.
The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show’s star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle’s relationship was “definitely gay.” However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O’Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode “Coming Home”, O’Connor commented, “If there was ever going to be one man in Xena’s life, it would be Ares.”
In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:
China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.
Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-
Call them for Best offers India and International.
404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,
Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station,
Opp. TMT Bus Stop,
Thane – 401107